Google Drive is an easy place to put your visual content. It's already in your tool stack, it's quick to set up, and your team knows how to use it. For documents and everyday files, it's hard to beat.

Managing a growing library of images and video is a different job. That's where Drive starts to strain, because it was never built to tag, search, resize and share visual content the way brand and marketing teams need.

This is a practical, hands-on comparison of Google Drive and a purpose-built digital asset management (DAM) tool, so you can decide where your brand's images and video should live.

TL;DR

• Google Drive is best for documents, everyday collaboration, and teams already on Google Workspace. It's cheap and familiar, but it can't tag, search or resize visual content like a DAM can.
• A DAM (Dash) is best for brands managing lots of images and video. You get AI search, auto-tagging, resizing and reformatting, and self-serve portals for partners.
• Pricing: Google Workspace starts at around $7 per user per month. Dash starts at £79/$109 a month for unlimited users and every feature.
• Bottom line: They solve different problems. Use Drive for files, and a DAM for your brand's visual content.

What is Google Drive? 

Google Drive is a cloud storage service that lets you save files, organise them into folders, and share them with teammates or outside collaborators. If your business runs on Google Workspace, you already use it. It's where your documents, slide decks, meeting recordings and email attachments live by default.

Drive supports almost any file type, syncs across every device you sign in on, and gives you granular control over who can view, comment on or edit a file. For general file management, it's hard to beat. The friction only shows up when you lean on it to manage a large, fast-growing library of brand visuals.

What is digital asset management? 

Digital asset management (DAM) is the practice of storing, organising, finding and sharing your digital assets from one central library. Those assets are things like product photography, campaign images, videos, logos and infographics.

A DAM tool is a searchable home built specifically for that visual content. 

Good DAMs like Dash include AI search, so you can type in anything (no matter how the content has been organised) and get relevant results in seconds. You can also add tags and fields, and create a system that matches how your team actually works.  

Dash also lets you:

• Share visual content with external collaborators: Say you’re working with a marketing agency for a brand campaign. Instead of sharing image folders from Google Drive, you can set up a Dash Portal—which is basically a public-facing extension of your Dash. The agency can browse the Portal to find all the assets they need for the campaign.
  ‍
• Deploy assets fast: Dash integrates with loads of apps in your tech stack. You can bulk-update products in Shopify, drop content into your Canva projects and deploy to your social channels via Hootsuite.
  ‍
• Organise your visual content: You can organise your visual assets into folders based on their content. What’s more, Dash lets you add tags and filters to your images so that you can find them fast. You also get beautiful image previews, not boring Google Drive thumbnails.

DAM vs Google Drive: Features

Now that you have a general idea of how both tools work, let's closely examine how DAM software and Google Drive compare.

‍

‍

Searching for visual content 

The whole point of a content library is being able to find the right asset fast, especially when you have thousands of them.

Google Drive search is built around file names, folders and text inside documents. If you don't know an image's exact file name, finding it means clicking through folders. 

A DAM auto-tags images on upload and reads the content of the image itself, so you can search “shirt”, “yellow” or “logo” and get results even when those words never appear in a file name. And, even if your assets aren’t tagged, a DAM like Dash has AI natural language search to accurately locate your image. You can also filter by custom fields like campaign, season or SKU, to help whittle down your results.

Organising your content

A library that's hard to navigate can cost your team hours every week. Especially when you have people in different teams needing access to your product images, logos, brand guidelines and more. They might end up coming to you to find the content for them, which will quickly eat into your time. 

Google Drive and DAM both use folders, and both let you nest folders inside folders. But that’s where the similarities end. 

Drive's folder-in-folder structure is its only real way to organise. It works until your library grows, then you end up with deep, competing folder trees and no single agreed home for anything. 

A DAM keeps folders but layers tagging, custom fields and collections on top, so the same asset can live in one place and still be found ten different ways. You also get proper visual previews instead of small generic thumbnails.

Image editing, resizing and formats

Your team rarely needs an image in just one size. The same product shot might need to be square for Instagram, wide for a banner and compressed for the website, often on the same day. If your library can't do that, every resize becomes a request to a designer or a detour through another tool.

Google Drive and a DAM both store your original files safely, so you never lose the master version.

Drive keeps the original and nothing more. To resize or change a format, you download the file, edit it somewhere else, then upload the result back.

A DAM lets you crop, resize and reformat as you download, using preset dimensions for each channel, without ever touching the original. 

Sharing and collaboration

Your brand assets need to reach a lot of people. Agencies, retailers, distributors and press all need the right files, and usually the newest version.

Google Drive and a DAM both let you share by link or email and control who can view or edit.

With Drive, you share a folder and the people you invite see everything inside it. Anything you add later shows up for them automatically, which is handy, but it also means they see your folder exactly as it is, structure, works-in-progress and all. To give a partner just a specific set of assets, you end up sharing files one by one or building a separate folder to keep tidy.

A DAM like Dash gives you a branded portal instead. It's a public page that shows only the assets you choose, customisable to look like you or your retailer's brand, rather than a Google Drive folder. Partners help themselves to what they need, and you control exactly what's visible, without opening up your wider library.

Integrations

Your asset library should connect to the tools you publish from. If you have to download and re-upload every image, the library isn't saving you time.

Google Drive works closely with Gmail, Docs, Slides and Meet, and it connects to other apps like Slack and Zoom too. But those integrations are built for productivity and file access, not for getting visual content out to your sales and marketing channels.

Dash integrates with the tools visual teams publish from, like Shopify, WordPress, Canva, Figma and Hootsuite. So you can send a product image straight to your store or social channels in a couple of clicks.

Google Drive vs DAM: Ease of use

Google Drive organises everything with folders inside folders. Each folder holds subfolders, and those hold more subfolders or files.

Say you have a work documents folder. Inside it are subfolders for product lines, campaigns and document types like contracts and reports. Inside Reports, there's a subfolder for each month. It works at first, but as your content grows the structure gets deep and tangled, and finding anything means knowing exactly where it lives.

That's a real problem for a visual library, where you usually want to browse and search rather than click through folders. Dash was built for that. Instead of plain Drive thumbnails, you get large image previews on a clear, visual dashboard. Here's what ecommerce brand COAT's Dash looks like.

"Dash has completely transformed the way we organise and structure our imagery, making everything else so much more efficient. That's why I've recommended it to so many people. I've worked with colleagues and friends in the same industry who constantly complain about their image libraries, and I know Dash would solve all those issues for them." — Abi, Brand Manager, COAT

Google Drive vs DAM: pricing

Google Drive pricing

A personal Google account comes with 15GB of free storage shared across Drive, Gmail and Photos. You can add more through a Google One plan.

For teams, Google Workspace starts at around $7 per user per month (annual billing) for Business Starter, which includes business email, 30GB storage per user and the wider Workspace app suite. 

Prices rise per user as you add storage and features. It's flexible, familiar and cheap, but its still only built for general file management. 

DAM pricing

DAM pricing can vary a lot. Some enterprise DAM tools run to tens of thousands of pounds a year, which puts them out of reach for most growing brands.

Dash is built for smaller and fast-growing teams, and the pricing reflects that. Plans start at £79/$109 a month and include unlimited users and every feature. You only pay more as your storage or your monthly downloads grow. Onboarding and migration support are totally free on every plan, and our Customer Success team are always on hand if you need help optimising your asset library. For the full picture, see our DAM pricing guide.

DAM vs Google Drive: which should you choose?

This isn't really an either/or decision. Google Drive and a DAM are built for different jobs, and most growing brands get the best results by using both.

Google Drive is your file manager. It's where documents, spreadsheets, slide decks and everyday admin belong. It's cheap, familiar and already part of your team's day, and a DAM doesn't try to replace it.

A DAM is your visual content library. It's the home for product photography, campaign images, video and logos, the assets you need to find fast, resize for different channels and share with partners. That's the work Drive was never designed to do.

Take a look at these Dash customers who made the move with their visuals from Drive. ✨

• Ethical bag company, Ethnotek, needed a way to share content with retailers. Now they use Dash’s self-serve portals to get content to their partners, fast.
  ‍
• 👟 Streetwear brand, Filling Pieces, found that Google Drive was holding them back. Nobody could find the images they needed. There were no naming conventions and the system was messy. Luckily they found Dash!  ‍
  ‍
• Haircare company, RevAir, realised Google Drive was stopping their brand from growing. Moving to Dash freed up their team’s time, and saved over 20 hours a month. 

Interested? Take Dash for a spin with a free 14-day trial or book a demo with a member of our team. 

DAM vs Google Drive FAQs

Is Google Drive a digital asset management system?

No. Google Drive is cloud storage for general files. It lacks the auto-tagging, visual search, custom metadata fields, resizing and portals that define a DAM. You can store images in Drive, but managing them like a brand library is a different job.

‍

Can you use Google Drive as a DAM?

You can, up to a point. For a small library with a few users it's workable. As your visual content and team grow, the lack of tagging, image search and easy resizing starts to cost real time, which is when most brands move to a dedicated DAM.

‍

What's the difference between Google Drive and a DAM?

Google Drive organises files in folders and is built for documents and everyday sharing. A DAM is built for visual content, adding AI image search, auto-tagging, custom fields, on-the-fly resizing and branded sharing portals.

‍

Is a DAM more expensive than Google Drive?

Usually yes at the headline level, because Drive's storage is very cheap. But a DAM saves time your team would otherwise spend hunting for, resizing and re-sharing images. Dash starts at £79/$109 a month for unlimited users, well below enterprise DAM tools that can cost tens of thousands a year.

‍

Can I search images by content in Google Drive?

Not in the way a DAM allows. Drive search centres on file names, folders and text inside documents. A DAM auto-tags images and reads their content, so you can search by what an image shows rather than what it's named.

‍

Do I have to choose between Google Drive and a DAM?

No, and most brands don't. The common setup is Drive for documents and everyday files, and a DAM as the single source of truth for images and video. Here's how to organise your Google Drive files alongside a DAM.

With Dash, connect your Drive, select your files and folders, and copy them across. For large libraries, the Dash team will handle the migration for free and keep your structure intact.